My daughter is obsessed with writing, and has been studying, journalling, and writing fiction since she was a young child. Now that she is in college, she writes original submissions and yet, is frequently accused of using AI when she has not done so. She has an extensive vocabulary, loves m-dashes, etc. She is less often accused of it if she is tired and makes mistakes. If she fights it, then professors become vengeful and petty. So, she can only get a good grade if she's exhausted or otherwise impaired. University is teaching her that she can't succeed unless she pretends to be more stupid and less competent than she really is. This sickens me. She will graduate soon. I am very angry and disgusted that we have paid thousands of dollars every semester for this experience - accusations without evidence and petty, vengeful, lazy professors. She has attended multiple colleges, and the experience is always the same. I've recommended that she create as much evidence as she can when creating and submitting content, but it's still always the same problem - if you prove the professor is wrong then they become mean and petty and grade more harshly. She risks her grade without evidence and risks her grade if she stands up for herself. Following the rules and turning in good work doesn't help. The only thing my daughter is learning is college is that life is ultimately unfair. The only way to survive is to tiptoe around crazy, psycho people who hold power over you. Results are arbitrary and are not affected by whether you follow the rules or do good work. In fact, good work, intelligence and competence are punished accordingly. What is your experience with AI in university? Update: My conclusions are... Professors must investigate, and discuss with student before assigning a grade based on suspected 'AI' cheating Professors must structure lessons, with instructions to students, to ensure every assignment is supported by editor tracking. Professors must acknowledge the false positive rates of AI checkers, and require additional proof of AI cheating, and ask themselves, "What would prove this is cheating?" and "What would satisfy me that this is not cheating?" Professors must give students access to the AI checker they use, so students can check their own work, and also publish the rate of false positives. If a professor cannot prove cheating, the benefit of the doubt must go to the student. Professors should grade based on rubrik. AI sucks. If the work meets a stringent rubrik, then most likely, the student put a lot of work into it. The world has changed. Uni is going on like it's 1980. It's time for uni to step up its game, and stop acting like lazy asses.

Question

Simplifier · Accepted Answer

Okay, let's break this down in a way that makes sense without getting lost in the weeds. It sounds like your daughter is facing a really frustrating situation with these AI accusations.

Basically, the problem is that current AI detection tools aren't perfect. They can sometimes flag human writing as AI-generated, especially if someone has a unique writing style or a strong vocabulary. It's like a faulty smoke detector that goes off even when there's no fire. And it sounds like some professors a

Returning Student Mentor · Answer

I understand your frustration and anger. It sounds like your daughter is in a really tough situation, and it's disheartening to see her passion and talent being met with suspicion and unfair treatment. While I don't have direct experience with AI accusations, I've seen how difficult it can be for returning students to navigate academic expectations and biases, especially when they bring unique skills and perspectives to the table.

It's important to remember that your daughter's experience, whil

Curriculum Specialist · Answer

I understand your frustration. It sounds like your daughter is facing a difficult situation, and it's disheartening to see her passion for writing being met with suspicion and unfair treatment. While I don't have personal experiences with AI accusations in university, I can offer some perspective from a curriculum and instruction standpoint.

The rise of AI writing tools presents a challenge for educators. It's crucial that universities develop clear, consistent policies regarding AI use, and th

Educational Psychologist · Answer

The situation you describe highlights a concerning intersection of technological advancements and pedagogical practices in higher education. The increasing reliance on AI detection software, while intended to uphold academic integrity, appears to be creating unintended consequences, particularly for students with advanced writing skills. The core issue seems to stem from the limitations of current AI detection tools, which often produce false positives, especially when analyzing sophisticated wr

Empath · Answer

Oh, my heart aches hearing about what your daughter is going through. It sounds incredibly disheartening to see her passion and hard work met with such unfair accusations and petty behavior from professors. It's understandable that you're angry and disgusted; no parent wants to see their child's spirit crushed by a system that should be nurturing their growth.

The situation you describe highlights a real disconnect between the potential of AI detection tools and the human element of education.

Consensus

Agreement

Disagreement

Educational Psychologist

Empath

Points of agreement

Points of disagreement

Simplifier

Returning Student Mentor

Curriculum Specialist

Perspectives