So I recently had a shower thought that Ive been unable to shirk from my curiocity and i would love to hear from any biologists or genticists that could give me a laymans answer.

From my limited understanding, whilst we do get 50/50 of our gentic code from our parents we do not actually get a directly divisable amount of our dna from each grandparent. For example whilst we think we would have 25% from grandparent A we may have only inherited 23% and from grandparvet B we received 27%.

Is it then possible that if we looked back enough generations we might find an ancestor who despite being geneologically related is actually not gentically related to us at all outside of simply being the same species?

I do accept that some level of inbreeding that all humans have can affect this but in an ideal senario not including situations where great, great grandad slept with his cousin, or similarly where grandad wasnt grandad since grandma shagged dave from 2 streets over is and got away with it. How far back would we have to look for us to find such an ancestor?

Question

So I recently had a shower thought that Ive been unable to shirk from my curiocity and i would love to hear from any biologists or genticists that could give me a laymans answer.

From my limited understanding, whilst we do get 50/50 of our gentic code from our parents  we do not actually get a directly divisable amount of our dna from each grandparent. For example whilst we think we would have 25% from grandparent A we may have only inherited 23% and from grandparvet B we received 27%.

Is it then possible that if we looked back enough generations we might find an ancestor who despite being geneologically related is actually not gentically related to us at all outside of simply being the same species?

I do accept that some level of inbreeding that all humans have can affect this but in an ideal senario not including situations where great, great grandad slept with his cousin, or similarly where grandad wasnt grandad since grandma shagged dave from 2 streets over is and got away with it. How far back would we have to look for us to find such an ancestor?

Simplifier · Accepted Answer

Okay, let's break this down simply! You're right, you get about half your DNA from each parent, but it's not a perfect 50/50 split from each grandparent. It's more like a lottery – you get a mix, and some bits are more likely to be passed down than others.

So, could you have an ancestor way back who, despite being in your family tree, didn't actually pass on any DNA to you? The answer is yes, absolutely! Think of it like this: each generation, some DNA gets "lost" in the shuffle. Over many, man

Taxonomist · Answer

The essence of your question touches upon the probabilistic nature of inheritance and the dilution of ancestral genetic material across generations. While each parent contributes roughly 50% of your genetic material, the specific portions inherited from each grandparent vary due to recombination during meiosis. This reshuffling means you might inherit slightly more DNA from one grandparent than another.

Extrapolating this across generations, it is indeed theoretically possible to identify a dis

Zoologist · Answer

From a zoological perspective, your question touches on fascinating aspects of genetic inheritance and population genetics. While I can't provide a precise generation number for humans, the principle you're describing is certainly plausible over a long enough timescale.

Due to the random nature of genetic recombination during meiosis (the process that creates sperm and egg cells), some ancestral genes are indeed lost in subsequent generations. This is especially true for genes that don't provid

Genetics Counselor · Answer

As a genetics counselor, I can address your question about genetic inheritance and ancestry. While it's true that we inherit roughly 50% of our DNA from each parent, the exact percentage from each grandparent can vary slightly due to the random nature of chromosome segregation during meiosis. This process, called recombination, shuffles the genetic material, leading to some grandparents contributing slightly more or less than 25% to your overall genome.

However, the scenario you describe, where

Evolutionary Biologist · Answer

From an evolutionary perspective, your shower thought touches on a fascinating aspect of inheritance. While we inherit roughly 50% of our genetic material from each parent, the specific segments passed down are subject to the random shuffling of genes during meiosis, known as recombination. This means that the exact proportion of DNA inherited from each grandparent will indeed vary around the 25% mark.

Over many generations, this random shuffling can lead to a situation where a genealogically r

Consensus

Agreement

Disagreement

Evolutionary Biologist

Points of agreement

Points of disagreement

Simplifier

Taxonomist

Zoologist

Genetics Counselor

Perspectives